FR
  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Breeding Field-Ready Canada Western Red Spring Cultivars for the Eastern Prairies

Written by: Ian Doig

Santosh Kumar develops CWRS wheat varieties for the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Brandon Research and Development Centre. The Canadian National Wheat Cluster is a key funder of the breeding work he and his team conduct. Paired with internal AAFC funding that advances breeding technologies, the creation of new varieties can be done quickly, efficiently and cost effectively, said Kumar.

 “Five-year cluster funding helps us make new breeding populations while taking the advanced breeding populations from previous clusters and finishing them as field-ready cultivars,” he added. “We continue to work from one cluster to another.”

 The development of cultivars for the eastern Prairies is one of two CWRS projects Kumar leads. Its central objectives are to improve CWRS quality traits, increase potential for high yield and boost priority-one disease resistance. In this geographic area that stretches east from Saskatoon to Ontario’s extreme west, good soil and long growing degree days are ideal for high-yielding varieties. However, the area experiences a very high incidence of Fusarium, rusts and bunt diseases due to high moisture and warm weather conditions.

 In this region, CWRS competes with soybean and corn for acreage. Kumar noted with increased global wheat demand over the last couple of years, CWRS acres have increased here.

 To minimize the amount of straw CWRS varieties produce under warm, moist conditions, the team develops semi-dwarf varieties. These tend to channel nutrients into grain yield rather than plant material. Their high stem strength prevents lodging, a valuable physical asset against Prairie winds that can result in serious harvest difficulties and quality downgrades.

 While these varieties deliver very high yield that ensures profitability, protein content must also align with the CWRS quality profile wheat buyers expect. “Its quality profile makes CWRS the king of wheat globally,” said Kumar. This includes high milling yield and gluten strength as well as adequate falling number, which Kumar described as paramount to good wheat grading results. The baking qualities of the dough must also be excellent.

 The creation of a broad disease package adds challenge. “Because we are public breeders funded by farmers, we go beyond the five priority-one diseases,” said Kumar. Disease resistance additionally includes loose smut and leaf spot diseases.

 The eastern Prairies region also has a high prevalence of orange blossom wheat midge, which can cause up to 15 per cent yield loss and grade loss due to kernels that are shrivelled and scratched. “We focus on that quite a bit in the eastern Prairies because it’s a problem in this area,” said Kumar. One of nine varieties developed since 2014, the breeding program’s latest is the midge tolerant AAC Hodge.

 The list also includes AAC Cameron, AAC Jatharia, AAC LeRoy, AAC Magnet, AAC Prevail and AAC Warman. These nine varieties hold solid track records, having performed very well while climatic conditions have varied greatly. “That tells us the varieties are consistently making good quality wheat through drought years or high rainfall years,” said Kumar. “Farmers can expect the best package that we can build for them.”

  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Pre-Breeding Platform for Canadian Wheat Improvement

Written by: Ellen Cottee

Lead Researchers: Dr. Sylvie Cloutier (AAFC – Ottawa) and Dr. Curt McCartney (AAFC – Morden)

With a global population of nine billion expected by 2050, many in the agriculture industry are interested in finding tactics to keep up with the growing demand for food. For Canada, feeding the world means growing and exporting even more wheat, a crucial crop due to its nutrient and calorie density.

One response to the call for improved and increased wheat production includes pre-breeding – a process that identifies key characteristics and genes in plant materials other than domestic wheat, and transfers them to materials breeders can work with to develop new varieties.

 Wheat geneticists are the first step in this process, narrowing down genetic data to find DNA markers and germplasms that show promising disease resistance and crop resiliency. Despite doing critical research, however, their findings don’t always see the light of day.

 “I found the work [geneticists] were doing fascinating,” said Dr. Sylvie Cloutier, principal research scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada – Ottawa, “but often, they were working in isolation or with one breeder, and their discoveries were not being taken up.”

 Building upon past research and discussions, Cloutier and her team received funding under the 2018-2023 Canadian National Wheat Cluster to bridge this information gap, setting out to create a database where wheat geneticists can share all their findings.

 “We needed to have a platform that was national in scope, that was fully open, where material and data is publicly available to everybody,” Cloutier explained, “and the chance to have it taken up would be greater.”

The platform is home to DNA markers and germplasms containing desirable traits, with the majority of current data focused on resistance to fusarium head blight and common fungal diseases. Instead of raw data, the database will also have search functions for breeders to narrow down traits of interest as well as a curator to assist with the addition of more information in the future.

Creating new wheat varieties through pre-breeding happens in three steps: discovery, transfer and deployment. This project focused on the first phase, compiling the important information geneticists find in the germplasm and DNA of wheat relatives. Cloutier said she hopes to move their work forward to the transfer phase in the upcoming 2023 – 2028 research cluster.

Adjacent to the creation of this platform, Cloutier received funding from Genome Canada to research wild wheat genetics – another key component of the pre-breeding process. These ‘cousins’ of cultivated wheat have genetic properties desirable to wheat breeders, growers and exporters, presenting an opportunity to further the genetic diversity and resilience of cultivated wheat varieties.

Looking to the future, Cloutier plans to progress the platform to the transfer phase of varietal development through the upcoming 2023 research cluster. Above all, she hopes her work contributes to – and helps to grow – Canada’s stellar wheat reputation.

“My goal is to make sure Canada continues to produce the best wheat, and we never lose that edge,” she said. “Canadian agriculture feeds the world, and I want us to stay there.”

  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Investigating Crop Management Options to Lessen the Impact of Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

Written by: Ellen Cottee

Lead Researcher: Dr. Kelly Turkington (AAFC – Lacombe)

Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) has long been an enemy of wheat producers across Canada. Emerging heavily in Manitoba in the early 1990s and spreading through the prairies in the late 2000s, the fungal disease causes kernel damage and wheat grade detrimental to producers’ bottom lines. In the worst-case scenario, FHB causes deoxynivalenol (DON), a mycotoxin dangerous to animals and humans if ingested.

Previous research on FHB focused on better understanding the pathogen and breeding new wheat varieties for resistance. While important in the ongoing fight against the disease, this approach neglects on-farm management options producers are able to implement themselves.

“It really has been a complex issue,” Dr. Kelly Turkington, researcher with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada – Lacombe said. “It’s a challenging disease for farmers to manage and in terms of research.”

Long interested in the prevention of FHB in wheat crops, Turkington launched two new projects under the 2018 – 2023 Canadian National Wheat Cluster to examine the impacts of crop management choices on the presence of FHB.

The first of Turkington’s projects focuses on how seeding rates could improve fungicide efficacy with fewer applications. Lower seeding rates lead to a wide window of head emergence, complicating the current fungicide recommendation of application at 75 per cent head emergence.

“That means you still have 25 per cent of the heads still in the boot, not directly protected by fungicide,” Turkington explained. “Once those heads emerge, they have no protection from the pathogen.”

Increased seeding rates can provide more uniform crop development and therefore more uniform targets in fungicide application. Trials combined different seeding rates with various fungicide practices, allowing Turkington and his team to see the larger picture. In the future, Turkington said research will likely integrate external factors, such as weather and pathogen forecasts, to build out recommendations for seeding rate and fungicide best practices.

Turkington’s second project examines the direct impact of crop management practices on FHB presence. One trial in the project focused on residue management – removing and treating all crop residue, including the chaff of the wheat, in order to reduce the amount of inoculum returned to the field following harvest.

Extended crop rotation periods, described as more than one year of a non-host crop before planting wheat, also showed success in trials. More time between the planting of susceptible varieties and crops allows for the inactivation of pathogen residue left on the field. While good news, Turkington clarified that the drought conditions of 2021 may have impacted the team’s assessments and they will need to collect further data this spring.  

With the final public report slated for release after the cluster closes March 2023, Turkington said he hopes his projects, along with future research, will give producers more FHB-fighting power.

“There are tools available, and I think we can tweak those tools,” he said.

“With the work we’re doing under the current cluster program … we have strategies – and perhaps some refinements – that will greatly help producers achieve better management of FHB on an annual basis.”

  • News Releases

New Study Shows Strong Return on Farmers’ Investments in Wheat Breeding

March 21, 2022 (Calgary, AB; Saskatoon, SK; Carman, MB) – According to a new study, western Canadian farmers have received nearly $33 in return through varietal improvements for every dollar they invested in wheat breeding.

In 2021, the Canadian Wheat Research Coalition (CWRC), which includes the Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission, Alberta Wheat Commission, and Manitoba Crop Alliance, along with the Western Grains Research Foundation (WGRF), and the Saskatchewan Winter Cereals Development Commission (SWCDC), began working together on a study to quantify the benefits of wheat breeding investments by western Canadian producers over the past 27 years.

The three farmer-led crop commissions comprising CWRC receive funding through mandatory but refundable producer levies on grain sold. The commissions contribute a large portion of their budgets towards innovative research on farmers’ behalf. Genetic and agronomic advancements to achieve maximum yields, and achieving a consistent end-use quality are properties on which the Prairie commissions base their research programming.

“This study clearly indicates that farmer investment in public breeding programs is working and is providing substantive returns to farmers,” says Fred Greig, Chair of the CWRC and Manitoba Crop Alliance representative. “Current information will allow CWRC and wheat commissions the ability to affirm our investment strategy and/or adjust it to better utilize farmers’ hard-earned dollars.”

The CWRC, WGRF, and SWCDC worked with Dr. Richard Gray and Dr. Katarzyna Bolek-Callbeck to update the previous studies that examined wheat farmers’ return on investment (ROI) for wheat varietal development.

Only yield improvements were considered when calculating the benefits to farmers to keep the estimate as conservative as possible. Including other traits such as improved insect and disease resistance would have further increased ROI but are dependent on specific environmental conditions and are difficult to assess. Improvements in agronomic practices over the same period were also not included in the final ROI estimates.

“Our measure is conservative because we don’t include many other potential benefits. It does provide a very defendable estimate because we can measure it accurately,” says Gray. “Wheat yields are something that everybody sees. They understand that the new varieties are better than the older varieties, yielding better, and improved yields are the key trait that delivers value back to the producer.”

The report also outlines that varietal development investments have a trickle-down benefit to all of society, with taxpayers reaping the returns, as well. Enhancing breeding capacity and maintaining funding relationships and budgets will be key to ensuring the continued success of farmer investments in varietal development moving forward.

The Benefits and Costs of Producer and Public Investments: Wheat Varietal R&D in Western Canada 1995 to 2020 Katarzyna Bolek-Callbeck and Richard Gray1

University of Saskatchewan
March 2022

CLICK HERE or click the image to download the report.

Media Contacts:

Cole Christensen
Communications Manager
Manitoba Crop Alliance
403-589-3529

Dallas Carpenter
Communications Manager
Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission
306-653-7967

Paula Campbell
Communications and Events Coordinator
Alberta Grains
587-832-1190

  • News Releases

Prairie Wheat Research Groups Commit $3.5 Million to the University of Manitoba for Wheat Breeding Activities

August 31, 2021 (Calgary, AB; Saskatoon, SK; Carman, MB; Winnipeg, MB) – The Canadian Wheat Research Coalition (CWRC), alongside the Western Grains Research Foundation (WGRF) and the Saskatchewan Winter Cereals Development Commission (SWCDC), have committed funding to a core breeding agreement with the University of Manitoba (UM). Valued at over $3.5 million over five years, this agreement will ensure the continuation of the successful Fusarium head blight (FHB) nursery program, along with the winter wheat breeding program.

The primary objective for the UM’s FHB screening nursery is to continue evaluating breeding lines for their reaction to Fusarium graminearum – the most common causal agent of FHB. As one of few FHB screening nurseries in Canada, the UM program returns vital information to the network of western Canadian breeding efforts, and is the key to developing future wheat varieties with FHB resistance. While the focus for winter wheat research will be the delivery of field ready cultivars, development of new genetic tools to help improve winter wheat quality will feature heavily. The agreement, which is an increase of $1.6 million over the previous core breeding agreement, also includes the training of students as future scientists in wheat research.

Known for her contributions to FHB research, UM’s long-time winter wheat breeder Dr. Anita Brûlé-Babel is set to retire this December, with Dr. Curt McCartney assuming the role. Prior to joining the UM, McCartney was a research scientist at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) in Morden, Manitoba, where he focused on cereal genetics targeting resistance to FHB, leaf and stem rust, and orange wheat blossom midge.

“This foundational funding of UM’s wheat breeding program ensures the continued evaluation of FHB resistance of breeding lines from across the Prairies,” says McCartney. “Dr. Brûlé-Babel’s research has been critically important for developing varieties with improved FHB resistance and has provided excellent training for graduate students. With this new agreement, I plan to build upon her successes through the development and implementation of genomics-assisted breeding techniques.”

The CWRC is a collaboration between the Alberta Wheat Commission, Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission and the Manitoba Crop Alliance with a focus on funding genetic and agronomic wheat research for western Canadian farmers. The UM agreement represents the fourth and final core funding agreement with the public wheat breeding programs in Western Canada. Previously announced agreements include $22.6 million to AAFC, $9.6 million to the University of Saskatchewan’s Crop Development Centre, and $2 million to the University of Alberta. These core agreements provide support to key capacity in the breeding programs. In recognition of the winter wheat and FHB focus of the UM program, WGRF and SWCDC are providing $935,000 and $50,000, respectively, over the term of the agreement. 

Quotes

“FHB is a growing concern across the Prairies as it not only compromises yield, but also end-use quality and food safety. As a farmer, my best line of defence starts at variety selection, so having access to FHB resistant wheat varieties is key for my farming operation.”

–        Fred Greig, CWRC Chair  


“The University of Manitoba is an important piece of the western Canadian wheat breeding network. Renewing this long-term agreement creates stability for the winter wheat breeding program and ensures access to a coordinated FHB screening nursery that will continue to provide benefits for the wheat breeding programs across western Canada.” 

–        Dr. Keith Degenhardt, WGRF Chair 

 

“Winter wheat is a sustainable crop that promotes good environmental stewardship. Breeding for winter wheat varieties that better survive prairie winters is critical to continued uptake and adoption by producers. A better understanding of the genomics which influence winter survival and improve quality will lead to cultivars I can incorporate into crop rotations to enhance my farm’s profitability.”

–        John Burns, SWCDC Chair

 

“The producer-funded support from the CWRC, WGRF and SWCDC will be critical for supporting a strong program of winter wheat breeding and FHB resistance research at the University of Manitoba. As Dr. Brûlé-Babel capably passes the torch to Dr. McCartney, I know we can look forward to continuing to develop profitable and climate resilient wheat genetics for western Canadian farmers.”

    – Dr. Martin Scanlon, Dean, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, UM

Media Contacts:

Cole Christensen
Communications Manager
Manitoba Crop Alliance
403-589-3529

Dallas Carpenter
Communications Manager
Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission
306-653-7967

Paula Campbell
Communications and Events Coordinator
Alberta Grains
587-832-1190

Mike Espeseth
Communications Manager
Western Grains Research Foundation
306-380-2553
mikeespeseth@wgrf.ca

Crystal Jorgenson
Communications Specialist
University of Manitoba
306-653-7967
Crystal.jorgenson@umanitoba.ca

  • News Releases

CWRC Commits $2 Million to the University of Alberta in Wheat Breeding Activities

May 3, 2021 (Calgary, Saskatoon, Carman) – The Canadian Wheat Research Coalition (CWRC) – a collaboration between the Alberta Wheat Commission, Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission and Manitoba Crop Alliance – has committed $2 million over five years towards a core breeding agreement with the University of Alberta (U of A). The investment will fund research activities through the U of A’s wheat breeding program with a specific focus on developing new Canadian Western Red Spring (CWRS) and Canadian Prairie Spring Red (CPSR) wheat varieties. The agreement came into effect on May 1, 2021 and will expire December 31, 2025.

A top objective of the agreement is for the U of A’s wheat breeding program to develop three to five registered wheat varieties focusing on the traits of early maturity, shorter straw stalk, and resistance to stripe rust and Fusarium Head Blight, all of which are key priorities of northern Alberta’s Parkland region where the program is located. The program is led by principal investigator and well-known wheat breeder, Dr. Dean Spaner.

“This agreement with the U of A is a natural fit as the CWRC recognizes the importance of having a strong breeding network across Western Canada,” says Fred Greig, CWRC chair. “Dr. Spaner and the U of A wheat breeding program have a history of successfully developing and commercializing wheat varieties with strong agronomic packages for prairie farmers.” 

Since 2013, the U of A breeding program has registered 13 CWRS varieties and one CPSR variety for a total of 14 varieties. 

“This funding from the CWRC provides tremendous solidification of our breeding capacity at the University of Alberta,” says Dr. Spaner. “Plant breeders have been at the forefront of feeding the world, and wheat production is an economic backbone for the western Canadian and Alberta economies, which makes this commitment from wheat producers to support our vital research a much-appreciated vote of confidence.”

In addition to delivering wheat varieties, the agreement specifies other key objectives including delivering one to three germplasm distributions, growing the infrastructure and breeding capacity at the U of A, and training a minimum of three graduate students. The U of A has the only CWRS wheat breeding program in Alberta, and is the only program that can grant graduate degrees in plant breeding in the province.

Today’s announcement with the U of A marks a significant increase from the previous agreement through the Western Grains Research Foundation (WGRF) which will conclude on May 7, 2021. The increase is due to significant progress and potential growth of the wheat breeding program. 

Quotes

“As a farmer in northeastern Alberta, early maturity traits in wheat give me more flexibility when faced with adverse weather, particularly during seeding or harvest. This investment shows promise and is directly attributed to farmers setting research priorities and establishing needed traits in Canadian wheat varieties.”

  • Todd Hames, Chair of the Alberta Wheat Commission
      

“My farm and thousands of others have benefitted from the work of wheat breeding programs such as the one at the University of Alberta. I’m proud that Sask Wheat is able to collaborate in this investment through the CWRC, as it will lead to new varieties that improve the profitability of growing wheat for farmers across the Prairies.” 

  • Brett Halstead, Chair of the Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission

“Not only are new wheat varieties important for Manitoba producers, but growing the infrastructure and breeding capacity at the U of A is a significant step in the continued growth and success of wheat breeding for Canadian farmers.”

  • Robert Misko, Vice Chair of the Manitoba Crop Alliance

Media Contacts:

Cole Christensen
Communications Manager
Manitoba Crop Alliance
403-589-3529

Dallas Carpenter
Communications Manager
Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission
306-653-7967

Paula Campbell
Communications and Events Coordinator
Alberta Grains
587-832-1190

Bev Betkowski
Communications Associate
University of Alberta
780-293-1592
beverlyb@ualberta.ca

  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Developing Winter Wheat Varieties Adapted to Ontario: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach

This multidisciplinary project is developing new winter wheat germplasm and varieties adapted to Eastern Canada, particularly western Ontario. Their objective is to incorporate enhanced disease resistance, tolerance against yield-limiting abiotic stresses (such as sub zero temperature during the winter and frost heaving caused by freeze and thaw cycles in the spring), higher yield, and improved quality.

The program includes two different breeding pipelines and employs genomic selection technology and DNA marker-assisted selection to accelerate advancement. Genomics is the study of plant genes (the genome). Genomic selection can be used to select for desirable traits, which can shave years off breeding trials by predicting how new lines will perform based on genetic markers.

The project was started by Alireza (Ali) Navabi, who led the University of Guelph wheat breeding program until he passed away in March 2019. While the scope has changed somewhat, this project continues. Helen Booker, who had been leading the flax genetics and breeding program in the Crop Development Center at the University of Saskatchewan, took over stewardship of the program in September 2020.

“We’re focussing on improving yield and yield stability, and that centres around improving disease resistance,” says Booker.

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major concern, not only because it causes yield reductions, but it can also contaminate the grain with deoxynivalenol (DON). Booker explains that DON can impact the functional characteristics of grain for end uses (such as making pastry or bread) and can be a human and animal health issue.

Booker says her program is looking at the inheritance of traits to help them breed more efficiently for those traits. They are screening early in development for lines that have alleles (different forms of the same gene) known for resistance to FHB and rusts.

“When we know which fixed lines carry those alleles, we can bring them forward even before it gets to the disease nursery stage,” she says. “Eventually we’ll test them in a nursery, but if we know that information beforehand it improves our selection efficiency for disease resistance.”

Stripe rust is a new disease in Ontario, and Booker says there isn’t much genetic resistance to stripe rust in current varieties, so they’re identifying rust resistance alleles and integrating those into their breeding program as well.

In addition to screening fixed lines, they’ve also started to do their own crosses. Some of their first crosses are now at the registration testing stage. “In a couple of years, we should have material out that comes from crosses initiated at the University of Guelph,” says Booker.

Booker’s team has been working with germplasm they received from Limagrain Cereals. She says the first product to come out of that germplasm source is OAC Constellation. It’s currently being registered for production in Ontario and will be available through SeCan.

It meets all of the agronomic requirements, says Booker, and it’s rated resistant to stripe rust and moderately resistant to FHB.

In 2021, two more lines of soft red winter wheat were supported for registration

  • OAC  19SRW01 is moderately resistant to FHB and leaf rust.

  • OAC  19SRW03 is moderately resistant to FHB and stripe rust.

This Wheat Cluster project received funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through the AgriScience Program, which is part of the Canadian Agricultural Partnership, a federal, provincial, territorial initiative. This project also received funding from Grain Farmers of Ontario, Producteurs de grains du Quebec, and SeCan.

 

To read the project profile, CLICK HERE.

 
  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Investigating Crop Management Options to Lessen the Impact of Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a fungal disease that infects wheat and other cereal crops. Depending on when infection occurs, FHB can reduce the number of kernels developed or result in Fusarium damaged kernels (FDKs) and contamination with deoxynivalenol (DON). If infection happens later, kernels may not appear damaged, but could still contain DON, which is a health risk for humans and animals.

“The presence of FDKs in harvested grain results not only in a reduction of yield and downgrading, but the infection will also impact functional characteristics of the grain for end users,” explains Kelly Turkington, a research scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

FHB is a difficult problem to manage. “Breeders have made incremental improvements, but the varieties we have available still don’t provide a high level of resistance,” Turkington says. “Fungicides provide suppression at best, and the crop rotations we’re using are not quite long enough to be an effective disease management tool.”

He recommends an integrated approach. “You can’t rely exclusively on one tool, you need a set of tools,” he says. “You need to rotate (not plant wheat on wheat), you need to apply a fungicide at anthesis (flowering), and you need to grow a ‘resistant’ variety.”

Turkington is running two different trials to explore a number of cropping strategies to reduce the impact of FHB. One is looking at crop rotation and residue management.

“We’re hoping to demonstrate the role extending the rotational interval from one year to two, or even three years, can have on disease risk, meaning the amount of infected residue that persists until the next time you grow wheat in that field,” explains Turkington.

Infected residue allows the pathogen to overwinter on the field and can result in spore production and reinfection if a cereal is grown the following year. The idea is to remove some of that highly infectious crop residue to reduce the extent of FHB infection in subsequent years.

The other trial is looking at row spacing, seeding rate, and fungicide timing.

He’s comparing narrow row spacing (7 to 10 inches) and wider row spacing (12 to 14 inches). Traditional thinking, he explains, suggests wider row spacing will lead to more air movement and shorter periods of high relative humidity and leaf wetness, which should discourage FHB. However, wider row spacing may also provide more wind access to infected stubble, which means spores could be more readily carried up onto the head. His theory is that low row spacing likely won’t have an impact on micro-environments, but it might help reduce spore dispersal.

He’s also comparing low and high seeding rates. Lower seeding rates result in more secondary tiller development and a less uniform crop. If you spray a fungicide when the main-stem tillers begin to flower, which is the ideal time, the heads on secondary tillers may not even be out and won’t be protected. Turkington’s theory is that higher seeding rates will result in more uniform crop development, more uniform head emergence, and hopefully better management of FHB when fungicides are applied.

Finally, he’s looking at four different fungicide treatments:

  • No spray (as a check)

  • Early application (about 4 days after head emergence)

  • Later application (about 7 to 10 days later)

  • Dual application (early and again later)

Traditionally, fungicide application happens at the beginning of anthesis. “It’s a key time for infection and production of FDKs and DON,” Turkington says. “If you apply a fungicide later, the concern is that it might not have the same impact. Based on research out of the US over the last five or so years, that simply isn’t the case.”

He says you can apply a fungicide later and have very similar, if not better management of FDKs and DON. However, later application may have implications for recommended pre-harvest intervals. Later or dual applications would likely require revisions to fungicide labels.

This Wheat Cluster project received funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through the AgriScience Program, which is part of the Canadian Agricultural Partnership, a federal, provincial, territorial initiative. This project also received funding from Alberta Wheat Commission, Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission, Manitoba Crop Alliance, and Western Grains Research Foundation. Turkington is hopeful his research will lead to improved strategies to mitigate FHB in wheat, thus limiting the impact of this issue for producers.

 

To read the project profile, CLICK HERE.

  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Development of Spring Wheat Varieties to Enhance Profitability for Producers in Quebec and Eastern Canada

Spring wheat accounts for about 90% of the wheat grown in Quebec—half is milling wheat, the other half is feed wheat. Unlike other regions of Canada, the feed wheat market is very important in Quebec, explains Silvia Barcellos Rosa, wheat breeder, Centre de recherche sur les grains (CÉROM).

She says growing conditions in Quebec are not as well suited to producing quality wheat as those in the Prairies. Canada eastern red spring wheat often has lower protein content and gluten strength than Canadian western red spring wheat grown in the Prairies. While it’s reasonable to assume this quality difference is mainly due to environment, wheat breeders developing new varieties for Eastern Canada are selecting for traits that will improve bread-making qualities.

The price of feed wheat in Quebec is similar to the price of milling wheat, but producers grow feed wheat because they can get a higher yield. “Local millers want to use more wheat from Quebec,” Rosa says, “but there’s not enough good-quality wheat grown here. If we can improve the quality, farmers will benefit from higher prices and better local markets.”

Eastern farms are also more likely to be affected by Fusarium head blight (FHB), a fungal disease that can significantly reduce yield and produce mycotoxins. Rosa acknowledges that FHB resistance is important everywhere, but she says “it’s especially so in Quebec because of climate conditions. A variety with good resistance to FHB would have a huge impact for Eastern producers.”

Rosa is using new breeding technologies to develop varieties with higher yield, improved quality, and more disease resistance, especially to FHB. For example, her program has built an indoor quality lab. “We can now select for quality indoors, which is something we were missing in the past,” she says.

She is also using speed breeding to develop advanced lines and get them to market as quickly as possible. When you’re growing outdoors in Canada, you can only grow one generation per year in the field. Rosa is using indoor growth chambers with 22 hours of light to grow four generations per year.

“The idea is to advance the lines indoors until they’re genetically stable, then select in the field,” she explains. “We’re not jumping the selection stage, but we’re selecting later.”

She’s also employing marker-assisted selection to identify desirable traits. She screens for genetic markers on DNA samples in early generations to identify plants that have the traits she’s looking for. This lets her direct her efforts to plants/lines with higher potential, which reduces the cost of field experiments later in the breeding process.

She’s also trying to identify genes that will help new varieties be more resilient to climate extremes. “The idea is to identify genetic regions that are related to broad adaptability,” she explains.

Climate change is a big concern. “We need to focus on material that can better tolerate abiotic stresses like high temperatures and dry conditions,” she says. “We’re going to evaluate cultures from all over the Americas and have trials in Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Quebec to try to identify lines that have broad adaptability and good resilience. We can then use those materials in crosses to develop new cultures that can better adapt to climate change.”

This Wheat Cluster project received funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through the AgriScience Program, which is part of the Canadian Agricultural Partnership, a federal, provincial, territorial initiative. This project also received funding from Producteurs de grains du Québec and SeCan. Rosa is using the funding to develop spring wheat varieties for Eastern Canada that will have higher yield and better quality for the milling industry, be resistant to major diseases, contribute to environmental sustainability, and, ultimately, increase profitability for producers.

 

To read the project profile, CLICK HERE.

  • 2018-2023 Wheat Cluster

Development of Canada Prairie Spring Red (CPSR) Wheat Cultivars for Western Canada

Most of the 1.5 million acres of Canada prairie spring red (CPSR) wheat grown in Canada every year (60 or 70%) is planted in Alberta. That’s just one of the reasons why Harpinder Randhawa, research scientist and wheat breeder with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, thinks he is ideally located for the development of new CPSR varieties.

Lethbridge is in the heart of Southern Alberta’s irrigation district, where the environment is semi-arid, moisture is variable, and the growing season is moderately warm, windy, and quite long. The climate leads to natural epidemics of stripe rust and wheat stem sawfly, but Randhawa says, stripe rust and Fusarium head blight (FHB) are the most imminent threats to wheat production in the Prairies.

“We’ve been selecting for rust resistance here for a long, long time,” he says. “We’ve developed a very good germplasm base and that’s very important because rust has spread so widely and it continues to mutate. Our objective is to diversify and find different genes for resistance so the resistance in our newer varieties will last longer.”

Randhawa says improved high-yielding wheat lines with new genetic resistance to diseases will provide producers with efficient and economical control, which will reduce input costs and environmental impact by avoiding the use of chemicals. “Our overall goal is to develop new cultivars that reduce business risks for producers and processors, improve net farm income, and reduce environmental impact through decreased chemical inputs.”

He started making crosses in his CPSR breeding program in 2014 and the first line from those crosses received support for registration in February 2021. He says HY2090 has excellent agronomics and higher grain yield. It’s rated resistant for leaf rust, stem rust, stripe rust, and common bunt. It’s also rated moderately resistant for FHB and has low deoxynivalenol (DON) accumulation in the grain.

It generally takes 10 years to develop a new variety (from the first crosses to registration), but he did it in only six and a half years. He uses doubled haploid technology to shorten the amount of time it takes to develop a new line.

“In a tissue culture lab, we take the embryo and generate a doubled haploid plant. It generally takes 8 to 10 months from the initial cross to make a doubled haploid plant,” he explains. “In a year and a half, we can make a pure line that would have taken six years otherwise. This really saves us a lot of time and is a very efficient way of developing a new variety. It’s an integral part of my breeding program.”

Randhawa says doubled haploid technology has been around for a long time, but “it’s resource intensive and takes a lot of hard labour, so not every breeding program uses it. It’s also rewarding, because time is money when you quickly develop a variety and save three to four years in the development process.”

He says breeders also have a new selection tool that saves time and makes the selection process more predictable. “Genomic selection markers help us select better plants more efficiently, so we can bring new varieties to the marketplace very fast,” he explains.

This Wheat Cluster project received funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through the AgriScience Program, which is part of the Canadian Agricultural Partnership, a federal, provincial, territorial initiative. This project also received funding from Alberta Wheat Commission, Manitoba Crop Alliance, and Western Grains Research Foundation. With this support for continuing improvements in yield, quality, and disease resistance, Randhawa says, “producers should find wheat to be more profitable, making it critical for the long-term sustainability of rural communities and the success of the bio-economy.”

 

To read the project profile, CLICK HERE.

Top